• Part 1

A new virus has been found in Wuhan China, known as the coronavirus. The virus, though old, has mutated to form a deadly infection carrier that has started taking a toll on the lives of Chinese citizens. Scientists across the globe have started worrying about the properties of the virus and nobody is able to understand what exactly happened during the mutation. Although unsure, some scientists believe that Ayurveda can be helpful in the treatment of this deadly virus. One such herbal remedy is Triphala, responsible for boosting the human immune system. Another supposed substance is the Giloy Bark, whose anti-inflammatory properties are supposed to counter the actions of the virus. Though there are a lot of other substances that might prove to be useful, these two have shown the most marvelous properties. The question that is left unanswered now is, how soon can we really get rid of this bane? Will it end right here, or will the world suffer the wrath of the bats?

  • Part 2

In the late summer of 1942, 22 year old Adina Blady Szwajger was working as a doctor at Warsaw’s Children’s Hospital. It was no ordinary summer, though. Some 18 months earlier, the Nazi occupiers of Poland had shut the gates on Warsaw’s Jewish population creating what is now known as the Warsaw ghetto. As a result, Szwajger had for at least a year worked in conditions of almost unimaginable suffering as the hospital filled with children dying of starvation and tuberculosis. In her memoir, she talks of “famished skeletons” lapping up the slops of a spilled soup pot from the floor; and of the attempt to live a “principled life” in circumstances of the utmost moral depravity.

But in August 1942, it became impossible to go on. The Germans had begun to round up the Jewish population, loading them into cattle trucks and shipping them off to the death camps, where their fate was to meet a grisly end. By this point, the hospital was no longer functioning as a hospital – there were “no children’s wards, just the sick, the wounded and the dying everywhere.”

The moment which came to define Szwajger’s life arrived when the Nazis turned up at the hospital, and began the brutal process of shutting it down. A nurse begged Szwajger to end her elderly mother’s life: “Doctor…I can’t do it. I beg you, please. I don’t want them to shoot her in bed, and she can’t walk.” Dr. Szwajger administered morphine, first attending to “families of staff.” Then she went to the ward which housed the smallest infants, and one by one gave each child a lethal dose. “Just as, during those two years of real work in the hospital, I had bent down over the little beds, so now I poured this last medicine into those tiny mouths…And downstairs, there was screaming because the…Germans were already there, taking the sick from the wards to the cattle trucks.” She told the older children “that this medicine was going to make their pain disappear…So they lay down and after a few minutes – I don’t know how many – but the next time I went into that room, they were asleep.”

Adina Szwajger took the lives of her young patients as the final act of what she saw as her duty of care, in order to spare them ignominious and certain death at the hands of the Nazis. But, of course, the infants and children did not and could not have consented. The issue, then, is whether she did the right thing. Was she morally justified in taking the lives of her patients in order to save them from their fate at the hands of the Nazis?

A. Yes, she was morally justified in taking the lives of her young patients.

B. No, she was not morally justified in taking the lives of her young patients.

(You are required to choose just one option out of the given two)

Get The Connectere directly in your E-mail inbox !

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Connectere and receive notifications of our new content on your E-Mail